![]() |
|||||
Afterschool: A Place for Older Youth to Mentor and Be Mentored (2009)Issue Brief No. 40 September 2009 The Afterschool Alliance, in partnership with MetLife Foundation, is proud to present the Afterschool: A Place for Older Youth to Mentor and Be Mentored Mentoring is a structured and trusting relationship that brings young people together with caring individuals who offer guidance, support and encouragement. Mentoring programs have grown rapidly in recent years and now serve an estimated 15 to 20 percent of young people who need the care and support of a mentor.1 While that percentage translates to three million youth, it leaves almost 15 million more youth unserved, many of whom are from disadvantaged social and economic backgrounds or do not have caring adults in their lives.2 Mentoring is a critical element in every child’s social, emotional and cognitive development. It builds a sense of industry and competency, boosts academic performance and broadens horizons. Along with parents, mentors help young people realize their potential by providing them with support, advice, encouragement and friendship. Afterschool programs, with their history of supporting families and communities, are an ideal platform for successful mentoring programs. The Benefits of Mentoring are Wide-Reaching
Mentors also gain considerable rewards such as:4
The positive effects of mentoring are well documented, and as a result, many mentoring programs seek to expand their reach by integrating older youth as mentors to younger children. These relationships not only provide participants with the same benefits as traditional mentoring relationships, but also offer the youth mentors additional rewards including:5
Despite Clear Rewards, Barriers to Successful Mentoring Programs Exist
Most mentoring is site-based, taking place in a wide array of settings such as the workplace, faith-based organizations, community settings, juvenile corrections facilities, and schools, where the vast majority of mentoring takes place.12 School-based programs offer benefits such as convenience, safety and the ability to attract a wide pool of volunteers. However, there are downsides. Because the school-based mentoring approach is built around the school curriculum and calendar, it is inherently limited in its ability to create the close, long-term relationships that are critical to successful mentoring.13 Further, school-based programs tend to focus on academic achievement often at the expense of other enrichment activities and experiences.14 Afterschool Programs are an Ideal Venue for Mentoring Afterschool can also facilitate the involvement of older youth as mentors, providing them with a structured, familiar environment and supportive adults to help them fulfill their commitments as mentors to younger children, benefitting all participants.16
Afterschool mentoring programs can offer access to long-term relationships, which are vital to successful mentoring. Mentors who have the opportunity to forge these bonds teach life-long skills that help young people navigate current challenges, while providing the foundation for success in the future.
Offering access to enrichment activities that engage youth is a hallmark of a successful afterschool program, and also a critical component of a successful mentoring program. Providing participants with access to extracurricular activities strengthens bonds and boosts retention and participation. Connecting youth to caring adults is one of the key factors in keeping youth involved in afterschool programs – programs that inspire learning, keep kids safe and help working families.
Academic supports can be an important part of mentoring; pairing struggling students who may not have access to academic assistance with caring adults. These types of mentoring programs are often the turning point for students who might otherwise drop out of school.
Conclusion 1 Mentor (2006). The National Agenda for Action. How to Close the America’s Mentoring Gap. 2 Rhodes, J.E., & DuBois, D.L. (2006). Understanding and facilitating the youth mentoring movement. Social Policy Report, 20(3). Available online at: http://www.srcd.org/documents/publications/spr/spr20-3.pdf 3 Ibid. 4 Taylor, A., & Bressler, J. (1996). Mentoring across Generations: Partnerships for Positive Youth Development. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York, NY. 5 Herrera, C, Kauh T.J., Cooney, S.M., Grossman, J.B., & McMaken, J. (2008). High School Students as Mentors. Findings from the Big Brothers Big Sisters School-Based Mentoring Impact Study. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA. 6 Rhodes, J.E., & DuBois, D.L. (2006). Understanding and facilitating the youth mentoring movement. Social Policy Report, 20(3). Available online at: http://www.srcd.org/documents/publications/spr/spr20-3.pdf 7 Spencer, R. (2006). Understanding the mentoring process between adolescents and adults. Youth Society, 37, 287-315. 8 Herrera, C., Sipe, C.L., & McClanahan, W.S. (2000). Mentoring school-age children: Relationship development in community-based and school-based programs. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA. (Published in collaboration with MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnerhsip, Alexandria, VA) 9 Blakely, C.H., Menon, R., & Jones, D.C. (1995). Project BE-LONG: Final report. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Public Policy Research Institute. 10 Mentor (2005). Mentoring in America 2005. A Snapshot of the Current State of Mentoring. 11 Grossman, J.B. & Rhodes, J.E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 199-219. 12 DuBois, D.L. & Karcher, M.J. (2005). Youth mentoring: Theory, research, and practice. Handbook of youth mentoring. Thousand Oaks, CA. 13 Herrera, C., Sipe, C.L., & McClanahan, W.S. (2000). Mentoring school-age children: Relationship development in community-based and school-based programs. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA. (Published in collaboration with MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnerhsip, Alexandria, VA) 14 School based Mentoring. Mentor. Retrieved on July 6, 2009 from http://www.mentoring.org/access_research/school_based/ 15 Rhodes, J.E., & DuBois, D.L. (2006). Understanding and facilitating the youth mentoring movement. Social Policy Report, 20(3). Available online at: http://www.srcd.org/documents/publications/spr/spr20-3.pdf 16 Herrera, C, Kauh T.J., Cooney, S.M., Grossman, J.B., & McMaken, J. (2008). High School Students as Mentors. Findings from the Big Brothers Big Sisters School-Based Mentoring Impact Study. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, PA.
| |||||
| Afterschool Alliance 1616 H St., NW, Suite 820; Washington, DC 20006; Tel.: (202) 347-2030; Fax: (202) 347-2092 | |||||